Why we’ll all be talking about the value of social media in 2011

- Image by DavidDMuir via Flickr
The debate and discussions about measuring social media, and those about social media ROI, often focus more on what can be measured than on the value that social media is creating for a brand. Over the last few years as brands have been experimenting with social media this is not unexpected. When we go through periods of innovation and experimentation we always tend to explore and discover the new tools we are using. But as social media has become more mainstream for brands, both as part of the marketing mix and more broadly across the business, we need to move from discussing the things we can measure to the things we should measure. From measurements to the actual value that social is adding to a brand.
Measuring and then evaluating the value that social is adding to a brand will be different from brand to brand. They are using social in different ways, across different parts of their business and are used to measuring value in different ways. There is not one solution, a panacea for all our social media measurement ills. Things are more complicated than that. However, this does not mean that we cannot measure the value we are having when we use social media. And as social media has moved from innovation and experimentation to more mainstream we need to take a more mainstream approach to value. And we need to talk about what we are measuring and the value social is creating.
There are many things that are not examples ‘value’ from social media – a large number of followers on Twitter or Likes on Facebook for example, or a large number of visits to an online community. Such things, whilst easy to measure, are not, in themselves, examples of business value. It is relatively easy to get more Likes of your brand on Facebook (running Facebook advertising being one obvious example), and this may open up more people you can broadcast your messaging to via their wall, but business value comes not from having Likes, but from what these people do for you. Brands and social media agencies need to talk more about this, about what their social media is doing for them and the value it is adding.
Now that social is a mainstream part of business, value should be expressed in more mainstream terms. We should be talking about things such as a lowered cost of new customer acquisition, and increased lifetime value of customer, a reduction in average customer serving costs, increased customer satisfaction, or greater brand awareness. We should be talking about actual value to the business rather than social media measurements. We should be talking about why we started using social in the first place and the impact it is having across the business
There are many things we can and should measure, but in 2011 the conversation will be about the value social is adding to a brand. Brands should be talking internally in these terms and they should expect any social media agency that works with them to be talking in these terms too.
This post is part of an informal series: Social Media in 2011.
For social media agency support get in touch or follow us on Twitter.
Trevor Godman:
Interesting, and absolutely pertinent Matt.
It relates to a thought I’ve had for a while that social media measurement (research) has a number of strands that are rarely clearly distinguished. My analysis isn’t exhaustive (and probably not that well thought through!), but I see the following areas …
1. Measuring/understanding what is going on in social media. This is absolutely analogous to more conventional media measurement – measuring reach and frequency of exposure.
2. Understanding the impact of brand coverage in social media – which you are talking about here. In many ways, this is closely related to item 1 in that brand owners will want to have a means of understanding ROI across all their marketing activity.
3. Using social media as sources of insight – either by monitoring what’s happening on existing sites, or using social media mechanisms to conduct formal research (e.g. creating online research communities).
It seems to me (as a casual observer), that there’s quite a lot of talk about 1 and 3, but very little about 2.
20 December 2010, 11:50 am40deuce:
Great thoughts Matt.
I think we’ve moved passed the point of companies saying they “should be in social media because it’s the thing to do” and we’re now moving into an age of “why exactly are we here and how are we and our customers benefiting from us being here”.
I feel like I’m saying this a lot now that the year is ending, but I’m really looking forward to see how the space is going to evolve next year!
Cheers,
20 December 2010, 8:21 pmSheldon, community manager for Sysomos
Bob Nunn:
I like this post. It’s realistic. And reflects that in about 60% of the time, purchases that start online finish offline so you can’t just ‘cut & paste’ someone else’s metrics. I wrote my thoughts on goal setting in a post 2 Ways To Achieve God-like Integrated Marketing if that helps. http://bit.ly/aYJ8Wp Hope this helps. Good work.
28 December 2010, 12:16 pmPRobecast #103: Comeback Brands, Relevancy, eBooks | Tech PR Gems - Topaz Partners Social Media and PR Blog:
[...] Forecast: social media in 2011 – It’s no shock that there are more and more companies and brands participating in the various social media channels. The Fresh Networks published a post that talked about what changes we should see in the discussion and implementation of social media in 2011. No longer should companies focus on what can be measured, they should be focusing on what SHOULD be measured. And this means focusing on the value that social media is providing to the actual business and brand itself [...]
7 January 2011, 9:09 pm72% of companies ignore influence of email on social media | Social media agency London | FreshNetworks blog:
[...] has a well established track record of delivering ROI, whereas discussions continue in terms of social media’s value. However, information offered by Econsultancy and Adestra from their 2011 email marketing industry [...]
13 May 2011, 6:28 pm