<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google soft-launches commenting &#8211; UGC search results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2009/05/google-soft-launches-commenting-ugc-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2009/05/google-soft-launches-commenting-ugc-search-results/</link>
	<description>Social media, Web 2.0 and online communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alain Saffel</title>
		<link>http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2009/05/google-soft-launches-commenting-ugc-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-4212</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain Saffel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/?p=664#comment-4212</guid>
		<description>And of course the danger with Google doing this is that people will, of course, try to game the system. This will make people question the results they get in Google.

Also, have you ever tried to use Twitter search? It&#039;s terrible! It may be useful for what&#039;s hot right now, but the database doesn&#039;t go back very far (maybe a few months) and finding things you know are there can be next to impossible. 

Twitter search has its place, but I rarely use it. It&#039;s just not that good.

Google search and Twitter search are different creatures, so Google shouldn&#039;t feel threatened. 

One bit of advice: you might like to define acronyms when you write a post. Not everyone knows that UGC is &#039;user generated content.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course the danger with Google doing this is that people will, of course, try to game the system. This will make people question the results they get in Google.</p>
<p>Also, have you ever tried to use Twitter search? It&#8217;s terrible! It may be useful for what&#8217;s hot right now, but the database doesn&#8217;t go back very far (maybe a few months) and finding things you know are there can be next to impossible. </p>
<p>Twitter search has its place, but I rarely use it. It&#8217;s just not that good.</p>
<p>Google search and Twitter search are different creatures, so Google shouldn&#8217;t feel threatened. </p>
<p>One bit of advice: you might like to define acronyms when you write a post. Not everyone knows that UGC is &#8216;user generated content.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Footprints (24.05.09) &#124; Chris Deary</title>
		<link>http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2009/05/google-soft-launches-commenting-ugc-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-4036</link>
		<dc:creator>Footprints (24.05.09) &#124; Chris Deary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/?p=664#comment-4036</guid>
		<description>[...] Google soft-launches commenting - UGC search results [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google soft-launches commenting &#8211; UGC search results [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atul chatterjee</title>
		<link>http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2009/05/google-soft-launches-commenting-ugc-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-3926</link>
		<dc:creator>atul chatterjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/?p=664#comment-3926</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know this about Google. Thanks for pointing out the difference between Facebook and Twitter in such a simple form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know this about Google. Thanks for pointing out the difference between Facebook and Twitter in such a simple form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
