Comments on: Why Facebook probably isn’t harmful (and may even do good)

By: chelsea

chelsea — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:38:28 +0000

this is soo cool…
i believe it all.
YAY!!!

By: Cambridge Alumni Magazine points | Stuart Glendinning Hall

Cambridge Alumni Magazine points | Stuart Glendinning Hall — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:26:15 +0000

[...] is good for you as it supports the way we now live our lives. Nice analysis of the controversy by FreshNetworks’ Matt Rhodes who knows a thing or two about social networks, and who’s an alumni [...]

By: Rob Benson

Rob Benson — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:37:47 +0000

I wish I could remember the book where I read the well-researched) fact that people that engaged in social networks were far more socially active than those that weren’t. It’s great opportunism from the Sigman man to match increased use of the web with failure to get out much, and inevitable that the Mail and others would report this as such. Clearly rubbish, the web is essentially a social medium and a great leveller for all, including people who might normally not get out that much.

By: FreshNetworks Blog / Why Facebook probably isn’t harmful (and may even do good) « Eclectic Buzz Blog

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:06:22 +0000

[...] via FreshNetworks Blog » Blog Archive » Why Facebook probably isn’t harmful (and may even do good). [...]

By: Social Media « Social Media Marketing, Thoughts, Facts & Data

Social Media « Social Media Marketing, Thoughts, Facts & Data — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:44:51 +0000

[...] a risk to your health of too much social networking, which was brought to my attention by Matt: Based on a paper by Dr Aric Sigman: “social networking sites such as Facebook could raise your [...]