<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And you thought Twitter was just a fad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2008/05/and-you-thought-twitter-was-just-a-fad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2008/05/and-you-thought-twitter-was-just-a-fad/</link>
	<description>Social media agency, online communities, marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:39:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreshNetworks Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Test Match Special via Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2008/05/and-you-thought-twitter-was-just-a-fad/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>FreshNetworks Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Test Match Special via Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/?p=95#comment-182</guid>
		<description>[...] love the way that people are experimenting with Twitter at the moment (see earlier post on how Twitter spread news of the Earthquake in China). It&#8217;s always struck me that too often people embrace new technology by trying to use the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] love the way that people are experimenting with Twitter at the moment (see earlier post on how Twitter spread news of the Earthquake in China). It&#8217;s always struck me that too often people embrace new technology by trying to use the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsey</title>
		<link>http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2008/05/and-you-thought-twitter-was-just-a-fad/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/?p=95#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Really good points Matt, thanks for the advice! It&#039;s great how blogging and the whole social media phenomena is forcing me to start thinking differently...it&#039;s really fascinating. I&#039;m going to set up an account and try it out. Thanks again!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good points Matt, thanks for the advice! It&#8217;s great how blogging and the whole social media phenomena is forcing me to start thinking differently&#8230;it&#8217;s really fascinating. I&#8217;m going to set up an account and try it out. Thanks again!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2008/05/and-you-thought-twitter-was-just-a-fad/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/?p=95#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Hey Kelsey,

Thanks for the comment and glad to hear you read the blog.

You are, of course, right. As with any information you need to be sure where it&#039;s come from and that the source is informed and trustworthy. I think there are a couple of things that are inherent to social media and social networking that can help here:

1) People usually tell you lots about who they are. Most people&#039;s Twitter profiles have links to their blogs where you can read a lot more about what they say, think and know; and of course you can usually look back through all the previous updates they&#039;ve written. To some extent we now have a surfeit of information - we know more about people than we ever did before. So to some extent we can check the authenticity of commentators based on what else we can find out about them

2) With almost all events, there will be more than one person reporting it. Whilst lots of people can be simultaneously wrong, this kind of peer validation is another good tool to use. If something is real then the chances are more than one person you know will be reporting on it.

So - if there&#039;s an update from somebody you can&#039;t find anything else about, and on a subject nobody else reports, then the chances are I&#039;d trust it less. Of course in reality things are less black and white than this.

Twitter&#039;s great - I only started using it when we were experimenting with it at work for various internal things. But then people I don&#039;t know started following me and it&#039;s grown from there.

Sign up for an account, see if anybody else you know is on there and then add more &#039;similar&#039; people using something like www.whoshouldifollow.com. Then take it from there. As I was told once, if nothing else the 140 word limit will help you to perfect your brief web 2.0 writing style (something I&#039;ve clearly broken with this response!)

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kelsey,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment and glad to hear you read the blog.</p>
<p>You are, of course, right. As with any information you need to be sure where it&#8217;s come from and that the source is informed and trustworthy. I think there are a couple of things that are inherent to social media and social networking that can help here:</p>
<p>1) People usually tell you lots about who they are. Most people&#8217;s Twitter profiles have links to their blogs where you can read a lot more about what they say, think and know; and of course you can usually look back through all the previous updates they&#8217;ve written. To some extent we now have a surfeit of information &#8211; we know more about people than we ever did before. So to some extent we can check the authenticity of commentators based on what else we can find out about them</p>
<p>2) With almost all events, there will be more than one person reporting it. Whilst lots of people can be simultaneously wrong, this kind of peer validation is another good tool to use. If something is real then the chances are more than one person you know will be reporting on it.</p>
<p>So &#8211; if there&#8217;s an update from somebody you can&#8217;t find anything else about, and on a subject nobody else reports, then the chances are I&#8217;d trust it less. Of course in reality things are less black and white than this.</p>
<p>Twitter&#8217;s great &#8211; I only started using it when we were experimenting with it at work for various internal things. But then people I don&#8217;t know started following me and it&#8217;s grown from there.</p>
<p>Sign up for an account, see if anybody else you know is on there and then add more &#8216;similar&#8217; people using something like <a href="http://www.whoshouldifollow.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.whoshouldifollow.com</a>. Then take it from there. As I was told once, if nothing else the 140 word limit will help you to perfect your brief web 2.0 writing style (something I&#8217;ve clearly broken with this response!)</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsey</title>
		<link>http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2008/05/and-you-thought-twitter-was-just-a-fad/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/?p=95#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt,

I&#039;ve newly been following your blog and I have yet to explore twitter though I&#039;ve been reading a lot about it and trying to wrap my head around it. Do you ever worry about credibility in terms of relying on these types of sources? That would be my only worry. As someone with a journalism background I think having credible sources is of utmost importance, because obviously without them, your own credibility could be threatened. Just a thought...interesting post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve newly been following your blog and I have yet to explore twitter though I&#8217;ve been reading a lot about it and trying to wrap my head around it. Do you ever worry about credibility in terms of relying on these types of sources? That would be my only worry. As someone with a journalism background I think having credible sources is of utmost importance, because obviously without them, your own credibility could be threatened. Just a thought&#8230;interesting post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

